Skip to main content

SF-0092 · Concept · Easy

What are record types?

✓ Verified by Vikas Singhal · Last reviewed 5/17/2026

A record type in Salesforce lets a single object support multiple business processes — each record type can have its own picklist values, page layouts, sales/support/lead processes, and assignments by profile. Record types are the standard way to make one Account object behave like an “Enterprise Account” and a “Small Business Account,” or one Case object handle “Tech Support” and “Billing Inquiry” with different fields, statuses, and screens.

What a record type controls

When you create a record type on an object, it owns four things:

Thing controlledWhat changes
Available picklist valuesPer picklist, you choose which values are available for this record type — a subset of the master picklist values.
Page layout assignmentPer profile, you choose which page layout shows when a user opens a record of this record type.
Business processFor Lead (Lead Process), Opportunity (Sales Process), Case (Support Process), and Solution (Solution Process), the record type is tied to a stage/status process that defines which values the master status picklist exposes.
Profile accessEach profile can have access to zero, one, or many record types — and one as default for create.

What record types don’t control directly:

  • Object permissions (CRUD) — that’s the profile/permission set.
  • Field-level security — also profile/permission set.
  • Validation rules — those apply across all record types unless you filter by RecordTypeId in the rule formula.
  • Triggers and flows — they fire regardless of record type unless your code checks.

When record types are the right tool

Use record types when:

  • Different business processes need different picklist values (e.g., “Industry” for B2B vs B2C accounts).
  • Different teams need different page layouts on the same object (e.g., Support sees ticket fields; Sales sees revenue fields).
  • The object goes through different lifecycle stages depending on the scenario (Lead → MQL → SQL for inbound vs Lead → Qualified → Hot for outbound).
  • You want to report by record type to slice data (“opportunities by record type”).

Don’t use record types just to hide fields — that’s FLS or page layout. Don’t use record types as a substitute for sharing — that’s OWD and sharing rules.

A concrete example

Imagine an Opportunity object supporting two distinct sales motions:

Record TypeStages (Sales Process)Page LayoutRequired fields
New BusinessProspecting → Qualification → Proposal → Negotiation → Closed Won/Lost”New Biz Opp Layout”Industry, Lead Source, Champion
RenewalRenewal Forecast → Renewal Negotiation → Renewed / Churned”Renewal Layout”Original Contract Date, Renewal Owner, ARR Change

A New Business deal does not need a Renewal Owner; a Renewal does not need a Champion. The same Opportunity object handles both, and reports can filter or group by record type to show each pipeline separately.

Profile access to record types

Profiles control which record types a user can create and which is their default:

  • A profile with access to only one record type doesn’t see the picker on New — Salesforce skips the prompt.
  • A profile with access to multiple record types sees the picker, with the profile’s default pre-selected.
  • A profile with access to zero record types can still open existing records (their access is governed by sharing/OWD, not record type), but cannot create new ones unless granted at least one.

You can also assign record types via permission sets — modern best practice when only some users of a profile need extra record types.

Common follow-up: which picklists do not support record types?

Most picklists support record-type filtering, but a few don’t:

  • Standard picklists that are tied to business processes — Lead Status, Opportunity Stage, Case Status, Solution Status — these are controlled through the business process linked to the record type, not via record-type picklist filtering directly.
  • Multi-select picklists: limited support; record-type filtering on multi-selects works but with quirks.
  • Standard “system” picklists like Status on Task have their own behavior.

In an interview, the safe answer is: “Most picklists support record-type filtering. The status/stage picklists tied to business processes (Lead Status, Opportunity Stage, Case Status, Solution Status) are filtered by the business process assigned to the record type rather than per-picklist.”

Limits and considerations

ConcernDetail
Max record types per object200 (current published limit — confirm in Salesforce docs for your release)
Record types and licenseAll editions that support custom objects also support record types
RecordTypeId fieldEvery object with record types exposes a system field RecordTypeId you can filter in SOQL, reports, validation rules, and flows
Inactive record typesYou can deactivate a record type — existing records keep their reference, but new records can’t be created with it
DeletionInactive record types can be deleted once no records reference them
Bulk record type updatesUpdating a record’s RecordTypeId is allowed; the new record type’s picklist filtering and process apply going forward

Real scenario

“Sales and Support both want to use the Account object, but Sales wants ‘Customer Tier’ as a picklist showing only Bronze/Silver/Gold/Platinum, while Support wants the same picklist to show only ‘Active’, ‘At Risk’, ‘Churned’. How?”

Two record types on Account:

  1. Sales Account record type — Customer Tier picklist shows Bronze/Silver/Gold/Platinum.
  2. Support Account record type — Customer Tier picklist shows Active / At Risk / Churned.

The master picklist on Customer Tier contains all values; each record type filters the master to show only the relevant subset. Page layouts differ too: Sales sees revenue and pipeline; Support sees SLA and case-volume metrics. Profile assignments give Sales access to the Sales record type and Support access to the Support record type, with each as the default for create.

Verified against: Salesforce Help — Record Types and Considerations for Record Types. Last reviewed 2026-05-17.